As the homeowner, is insurance cheaper listed as a rental or as a second dwelling?

June 22nd, 2009 | by The Broker |
Sandy R asked:


I have two homes, My son lives in one and I live in the other. Is it cheaper on the one my son lives in to insure it as a second dwelling or as rental property?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Diigo
  • MisterWong
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Technorati Tags: , ,

  1. 3 Responses to “As the homeowner, is insurance cheaper listed as a rental or as a second dwelling?”

  2. By carpediemmaster on Jun 24, 2009 | Reply

    second dwelling although if you lie, it may make your insurance invalid

  3. By mbrcatz on Jun 27, 2009 | Reply

    It depends. Do you want the insurance company to actually PAY OUT if it burns down? IF so, you’ll have to list it as a rental, as YOU don’t live in it. Your son, is NOT YOU. You can’t call him, “household member” and voila! it’s owner occupied. It doesn’t WORK that way.

    It’s NOT a second dwelling. It’s a rental property. Even if you don’t collect rent on it.

    As to which costs more, it’s pretty much a tossup. Usually, the rental doesn’t have any contents coverage, so that makes it cheaper. Usually, the secondary dwelling doesn’t have LIABILITY coverage, so that makes THAT a bit cheaper.

    But if the claim is denied because you lied about the occupancy, it’s going to be damned expensive.

  4. By Margueritta K on Jun 30, 2009 | Reply

    Sandy R, Home insurance is actually very flexible. I don’t understand all the details of my policy, but my home insurance agent is always helpful. Try calling your agent or a agent in your city. They will be able to help you.

Post a Comment