A question asked by dsjnix: Which is more likely to be covered by homeowners insurance?
Is homeowners insurance more likely to cover damages to a subfloor caused by an invisible long term leak from plubming in the wall or by damages caused by a shorter term leak from a dishwasher? Or would they typically cover neither? And why will they not pay for our dinners out when we have no use of our kitchen for several weeks?
Most comprehensive answer:
Answer by mbrcatz
Well, seepage that occurs over time isn’t going to be covered, no matter where it’s from. Sudden accidental damage, like a burst pipe in the wall, or a rupture in the hose in the dishwasher, will both be covered.
Many policies have an exclusion for any water damage, where the water has leaked out for more than 30 days.
As to why they won’t pay for dinners out – because they only pay for INCREASED living expenses. If you normally ate out 5 days a week, there’s no INCREASE. If you didn’t, you can do quite well, with microwaving and toaster oven, just about anything. And it doesn’t have to be in the kitchen!!
When they DO give you additional living expenses, the food allowance is VERY small, like $ 5 per meal per person. You can’t hit Ruth Chris on the insurance company’s dollar, it’s more like McDonalds.
Provide your own answer to this question below!
Technorati Tags: covered, homeowners, Insurance, likely, more